[原創] 我和電影的黒暗 1

kaka2013

我和電影的黒暗

在我小時的時候,爸爸買了一部DVD機和一部古老西動作
片―「第一滴血」。「甚麼血?」我怕怕的半氣地問爸爸。
「好似好恐佈,是鬼片嗎?」「哈!」爸爸仰頭大聲ー笑。
這是動作西片,好好看,一同看看吧!」「好吧!」我笑道
。

「好好看……好可憐的Rainbow……」我哭着説。「
是Rambo……啊女=.=」爸爸説。「@@,哦哦,R
ambo是我的愛人^^」。我面紅紅地説。「人細鬼大!
」爸爸笑道。「妳知不知他幾多歳?不…是…犯太歳吧!」
爸爸問我。「唔……18歳! =p  ……。」
我陶氣地回答。「可能環大過妳爸爸我吧……」。我@@説
「不是嗎!!!」

那時的我真的很鐘意那個史太林……不不不是!!!!!是
史太龍。「嘉嘉,妳又下戴「屎太硬」的電影,他的相貌一
點也不英俊,不如看看《鐡達尼》好一點吧……Leona
rdo ……好有型吧!!!」我的女同學輕跳地説。

之後,我下戴了《鐡達尼》看,只見一個花花少年在船上的
愛情故事,一點也不有型。但世界就被Leonardo.
.......Leonardo Dicaprio 所影響了電影的發展了………

電影在《鐡達尼》的影子下,出現不小男演員新星。例如,
, Russell Crowe, Hugh Jackman, Elijah Wood, Viggo Mortensen, Orlando Bloom, Daniel Radcliffe, Gerard Butler, Robert Downey, Jr, Shia LaBeouf, Jeremy Renner , Daniel Craig。

而,八十年代的男明星則是, Harrison Ford, Christopher Reeve, Roger Moore, Richard Gere , Sylvester Stallone , Schwarzenegger , Tom Cruise , Bruce Willis , TomHanks, Keanu Reeves , PierceBrosnan , Nicolas Cage

你們覺得有甚麼分別?

我相信電影中的男女主角是一個對比性別的象徴,而不同時
代的導演就用不同的方式。而社會的文化是被電影麻目的衝
擊下成長.不幸地,世界中人類無辜被定了型(男或女)。

LBGT (the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community)是一種流行潮風,因為它是代表文化
革新,自由,真愛的表現,故此它的文化革新是代表了流行
潮風之感,而在香港更是一個年青人反叛的心理的象徴, 港青大多看電影度日……所以 ,電影中對它的影響一定存在的。

當然我本身相信性與性別的取向是天生,但港人昰相信它是
一種流行潮風多於一切。

從相貌中,怎樣才是男性,怎樣是オ女性?有沒有科學理據
?

先看看wiki 中對性別的定義和理解

Gender is a range of physical, mental, and behavioral characteristics distinguishing between masculinity and femininity. Depending on the context, the term may refer to sex (i.e. the state of being male or female), social roles (as in gender roles), or gender identity.

Gender studies is a branch of the social sciences. Sexologist John Money introduced the terminological distinction between biological sex and gender as a role in 1955. Before his work, it was uncommon to use the word "gender" to refer to anything but grammatical categories. However, Money's meaning of the word did not become widespread until the 1970s, when feminist theory embraced the distinction between biological sex and the social construct of gender. Today, the distinction is strictly followed in some contexts, especially the social sciences and documents written by the World Health Organization (WHO), but in many contexts, even in some areas of social sciences, the meaning of gender has expanded to include "sex" or even to replace the latter word. Although this gradual change in the meaning of gender can be traced to the 1980s, a small acceleration of the process in the scientific literature was observed when the Food and Drug Administration started to use "gender" instead of "sex" in 1993. "Gender" is now commonly used even to refer to the physiology of non-human animals, without any implication of social gender roles.

In the English literature, the trichotomy between biological sex, psychological gender, and social sex role first appeared in a feminist paper on transsexualism in 1978.Some cultures have specific gender-related social roles that can be considered distinct from male and female, such as the hijra of India and Pakistan.

While the social sciences sometimes approach gender as a social construct, and gender studies particularly do, research in the natural sciences investigates whether biological differences in males and females influence the development of gender in humans; both inform debate about how far biological differences influence the formation of gender identity.

Social assignment and the idea of gender fluidity

According to Kate Bornstein, gender can have ambiguity and fluidity. There are two contrasting ideas regarding the definition of gender, and the intersection of both of them is definable as below:

The World Health Organization defines gender as the result of socially constructed ideas about the behavior, actions, and roles a particular sex performs.The beliefs, values and attitude taken up and exhibited by them is as per the agreeable norms of the society and the personal opinions of the person is not taken into the primary consideration of assignment of gender and imposition of gender roles as per the assigned gender. Intersections and crossing of the prescribed boundaries have no place in the arena of the social construct of the term "gender".

The assignment of gender involves taking into account the physiological and biological attributes assigned by nature followed by the imposition of the socially constructed conduct. The social label of being classified into one or the other sex is obligatory to the medical stamp on the birth certificate. The cultural traits typically coupled to a particular sex finalize the assignment of gender and the biological differences that play a role in classifying either sex is interchangeable with the definition of gender within the social context.

In this context, the socially constructed rules are at a cross road with the assignment of a particular gender to a person. Gender ambiguity deals with having the freedom to choose, manipulate and create a personal niche within any defined socially constructed code of conduct while gender fluidity is outlawing all the rules of cultural gender assignment. It does not accept the prevalence of the two rigidly defined genders "man" and "woman" and believes in freedom to choose any kind of gender with no rules, no defined boundaries and no fulfilling of expectations associated with any particular gender.

Both these definitions are facing opposite directionalities with their own defined set of rules and criteria on which the said systems are based