samhau

「暫時失明」這點很有保留. 不少軍警引入新型「非致命武器」都聲稱沒有永久傷害, 但後果總會發現有後遺症. 這次只不過是借機引入新的強力武器方便執法. 對民權往往弊多於利.

samhau

well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.
  C# `0 d/ g1 m  w: c4 E1 |" wtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb
# L  u1 ]6 B4 @1 A/ T: STVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons./ C; r) J# c- W2 V! f3 b0 }/ K
1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 A: Q: X& W, g8 H0 n0 t4 x
2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing.