Board logo

標題: [討論] 普通dc的話,大家覺得究竟係canon好定係sony好d? [打印本頁]

作者: youmum    時間: 2008-2-21 11:22 AM     標題: 普通dc的話,大家覺得究竟係canon好定係sony好d?

大家覺得其實同價位既機,好似$2000~$3000到既dc, canon機會好d,定係sony機會好d,大家比下意見討論下~~~~:onion14:
作者: youmum    時間: 2008-2-21 11:23 AM

自己頂下自己先
作者: youmum    時間: 2008-2-22 11:24 PM

有無人可以比下意見
作者: xtina_disney    時間: 2008-3-1 02:59 AM

i think sony....
sony looks nicer and that is easy to change the setting.
canon seems like...not as nice looking as sony, but have more different setting.
作者: eeelung    時間: 2008-3-2 03:38 AM     標題: what you want???

I like shooting for a long time.
              Ask yourself what kind of quality by your camera.....
              CANON is very performance even for professional.
              SONY=MINOTA+carl ziess lens.If you enjoy to have good
              quality in ziess lens.SONY is your choice!!!
作者: tonydriving2006    時間: 2008-3-4 12:59 AM

論相片,富士好過CANON & SONY 好多:014:

SONY d 所為 ziess 鏡片.....

[ 本帖最後由 tonydriving2006 於 2008-3-4 01:02 AM 編輯 ]
作者: dianlong    時間: 2008-3-17 03:47 PM     標題: what you want to shot?

depends on what you want to shot.
i most prefer canon if only can choose one from these two brand.
in this price $2000-3000, may be i bought canon G9.
ha ha, i hope its still in budget.
作者: jackandy    時間: 2008-3-18 10:18 PM

肯定是佳能的
作者: tvbking    時間: 2008-3-19 04:47 AM

現在我用的都是sony, 以前都有用canon,可是覺得sony 好一點
作者: Anique    時間: 2008-3-22 10:27 PM

Of course is canon!
Coz if compare with others brand,canon's picture quality is better than others.
While sony's screen looks nicer .But don't forget , sony is made screen de. It may have different with the pic that u print it out.
Canon is made lens de. Good quality picture must have good quality lens.
It u want to buy canon , I suggest u to buy Ixus 860is. It's with wide angle and 8 mege pixel.
作者: hgnbt    時間: 2008-3-23 05:37 PM

CANON好,CANON是老牌厂商。SONY的小DC只是比较时尚而已,而单反只是沿用了美能达的技术。
作者: pazu86    時間: 2008-4-16 06:11 AM

我個人應為canon好D可能因為我玩埋水底攝影而且佢好多Dc都有潛水殼所以覺得好D
作者: hello^^    時間: 2008-4-18 02:53 PM

Sony's camera... is not as good as canon
... they r not pro with it...
and sony's camera dosent last long..
So i beleive Canon is better~~~
作者: skylineis131    時間: 2008-4-23 02:31 PM

非常感謝~~~分享
作者: yesman88    時間: 2008-4-28 02:31 AM

I compared both brand's picture quality and found Canon is sharper and more vivid in the daylight (e.g. under the sun or well lighted) but Sony is superior with it's flash technology (e.g. in the party or BBQ night on the beach). So depending on your need. If you go clubbing, indoor party, or someone's home I recommended Sony, but if you take scenic pictures like mountain, buildings, theme parks, portrait under the sun then you may wise to get Canon because the picture is very sharp.
作者: hkceo    時間: 2008-4-28 06:43 PM

方便易用,影人像
一定是cannon的:onion14:
作者: terez_80    時間: 2008-7-15 01:10 PM

Canon picture quality better.
作者: stony    時間: 2008-7-28 11:00 PM

專業推介:大機Cannon;細機Sony!!!
作者: clcv1979    時間: 2008-8-2 08:22 PM

depen on what you want. but i prefer canon
作者: withoutproblem    時間: 2008-8-13 11:11 PM

Canon is better than sony.
作者: tcyong80    時間: 2008-8-17 08:49 AM

Base on my experience i prefer to buy Canon.
In market the top selling camera is Canon!
作者: weericky2000    時間: 2008-8-24 01:50 AM

论反应,外形,canon 好很多。
作者: 92920    時間: 2008-9-3 01:38 PM

这个东西要用了以后才知道,单反SONY不行,但卡片机就不一样了!SONY得侯服设计是很厉害得,除非你很专业,但既然买卡片机得话我想也不是很专业得人事,我建议卡片机SONY,单反还是富士的好!
作者: 056123    時間: 2008-9-13 11:14 PM

仲OK啦~~!
作者: zekes    時間: 2008-9-27 03:05 PM

Ii am sure that canon must better than sony at normal DC rank.
作者: 號獃    時間: 2008-9-30 07:31 PM

我是用nikon滴~~
作者: sys_kent    時間: 2008-10-7 09:42 AM

if you say out look, is sony
but quality is Canon
作者: ritz7919    時間: 2008-10-20 09:14 PM

canon d相靚好多..
作者: georgewongyf    時間: 2008-10-23 11:42 PM

Most of the lenses by Canon and even Nikon are old, year 1990+
while Sony is modified from previous Konica Milnolta with improvements.
Sony is using CCD, the details is better than CMOS.
Canon good for Landscape
Sony good for general.
Nikon good for fast action.

Sony A900 full frame will be my next cam after compared with D700 and 5D Mark II.
作者: 月讀    時間: 2008-10-24 12:59 AM

must be canon
作者: Yong_e.j    時間: 2008-11-16 12:16 AM

我个人觉得canon 比 sony 好,应为sony 是吃名罢了,而 canon 是专出相机和镜头。所以个人比较支持canon.
作者: slylium    時間: 2009-1-4 02:52 AM

I am Canon SLR/DSLR user for many years, last few months I was looking for a normal compact DC for convenience. And my selection is based on:
1st = Wide Angle
2nd = Good Image Quality/Low Noise (especially at higher ISO, e.g. indoor shooting)
3rd = Fast/Responsive
4th = Price

After searching for a while, I got 3 DC with wide angle below for comparison and my comments:
1. Canon IXUS 860IS - Noise exist in even at not too high ISO, Canon G10 not in market yet ...
2. Fujifilm F100FD - uses super CCD produces good image quality up to ISO 800, except manual function is a bit less. I bought this although I am supporting Canon for many many years
3. Panasonic TZ5 - Wonderful features & zoom range, except picture will show a bit soft at after ISO 400, probably due to noise deduction)

And Sony is totally OUT for my requirements, what I can say is Sony is having more good design, colorful, new & high tech features to attract consumers (who prefer latest technology, e.g. Full HD) & for better marketing. It's a SONY! like.no.other
作者: koalakun    時間: 2009-1-4 02:03 PM

最初我鐘意sony,但係宜家我鐘意Canon啦!
作者: Sman    時間: 2009-1-6 02:16 AM

Sony is more fun to use, but Cannon is usually rated better in terms of picture quality.  However, that difference is not usually noticable for more people.  So it depends on what you want.
作者: andydy    時間: 2009-1-9 03:38 PM

一定係canon~~
夜影人像可以話係無敵
sony的dc仔好光好易over
作者: xx_david_xx    時間: 2009-1-9 04:04 PM

大同小异。but i support NIKON .. not y .. jz like a name
作者: op1234    時間: 2009-1-11 09:37 PM

canon!
作者: xterry    時間: 2009-1-17 08:50 AM

香港的CANON 400D几钱啊???可以考虑???

如果纯粹DC,影景,应该CANON好D,如果影人,应该SONY好D,不过FUJI会影得瘦D
作者: toy1    時間: 2009-1-30 08:26 AM     標題: 普通dc的話,大家覺得究竟係canon好定係sony好d?

I think that both cameras are good but I think that the memory stick for the Canon will be cheaper than the memory stick for the Sony.
作者: Chairly    時間: 2009-1-30 11:56 PM

梗是Canon啦,sony的镜头唔得啊·~~
作者: lokwa    時間: 2009-2-6 07:34 AM

現在我用的都是sony, 以前都有用canon,可是覺得sony 好一點
作者: wogay    時間: 2009-2-6 09:41 AM

i like cannon
作者: maes    時間: 2009-2-19 01:53 PM

SONY设计方面大多数轻巧美观,适合一般年轻人的需求....
CANON基本强调摄影素质,拍摄方面比较优秀....
若想要拍照好的就选CANON吧.....
至于价钱就自己衡量了....
作者: rtw8707    時間: 2009-2-20 01:04 PM     標題: Sony better

Check the E18 error code online of Canon..........Canon has a long history of problem of its DC
作者: woo913    時間: 2009-2-25 01:57 PM

If budget is allowed, u can try to google for Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3. Very high quallity image and built. Leica lenses, f2.0 24mm wide, very good for low light shooting, such as dim area like western restaurant without using flash. If this is not your favour, i would advice you to go for canon, why? I have been used for Olympus, Sony, Canon, Minolta. For Compact Camera wise, canon power shot really work. You just point and shot, let the computer inside work out the image for you. Sony is very nice and trendy, but feeling that the machine a little bit sluggish. The other two no need to explain coz not in your purchasing bracket.

Furthermore, it is very cheap to get high capacity media card comparing to sony memory stick, where there are only a few players around the market.
作者: vientos_99    時間: 2009-4-3 12:37 PM

肯定是佳能
作者: cfstan2008    時間: 2009-5-10 07:57 AM

I think Panasonic  TZ15 better than all Dit. Camera.
作者: careofu    時間: 2009-5-11 11:50 PM

要亮骚,就sony

论画质和色彩,nikon和cannon要好的多
作者: tan7757    時間: 2009-5-20 06:34 AM

canon 电子技术比较好。
作者: xterry    時間: 2009-5-20 08:09 AM

sony應該比較好,但同性能的SONY會比CANON貴。。。但同價的,SONY會比CANON外形討好,而且成像會比較變形。(無錯,係變形,D女仔喜歡影瘦D),CANON同SONY,個人比喻係:油畫同相機

但如果DSLR級的,我就係CANON的FANS
作者: kelfuk    時間: 2009-5-22 09:51 PM

I like CANON
作者: xxkelvinxx    時間: 2009-6-2 12:44 AM

canon 吧!但是我会选panasonic lumix, leica lens....
作者: moxfactor    時間: 2009-6-8 04:09 PM

canon g10俾定為高ISO最差既DC仔.  如果陽光/燈光夠, Sony, Canon, Pana 冇乜大分別, 睇你想部機可以做d乜...  要wide-angle: Pana LX3, 要似DLSR級數: Canon G9, 要方便夠細: Sony S60...

乜牌子根本冇乜大關係.  有問題既只有Sony強迫用Memory Stick, 其他都係SD.  如果以後換機換走or換成Sony要浪費錢再買過記憶卡...
作者: envelope    時間: 2009-6-11 06:22 PM

sony nice to see canon nice to use
作者: faye1314    時間: 2009-6-11 09:31 PM

樓主講緊普通dc.

我絕對覺得canon影人係令過sony.

皆因我2部牌子既dc仔都有...
作者: daidaibare5    時間: 2009-6-11 11:45 PM

canon顏色比較自然~sony顏色太鮮豔ㄌ
作者: JackyYau    時間: 2009-6-14 10:44 AM

i thank sony la
作者: ng_chin_hui    時間: 2009-6-14 07:33 PM

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: honkikihon    時間: 2009-6-22 04:42 PM

of canon!!! if SLR then Canon 100%, if compact camera then i will go for Panasonic as it use lecia lens!!

unlike Sony, Canon is really good at making camera they have been for many year. Sony is only good with T.V
作者: rick_wbw    時間: 2009-7-7 05:04 PM

个人认为,sony的外形好,canon的成像好。
其实都是卡片,ccd在那里摆着的,效果应该差不了多少。
作者: 小丹尼    時間: 2009-7-13 11:01 AM

Canon is a famous brand for making camera while Sony is just an overall better than average in all kinds of electronic
Many people will say Canon is better than Sony if your purchasing camera which is TRUE
However, if your budget is 2000 to 3000 then its another story you have to try to know which one suits you better
To be serious 2000 to 3000 for a camera don't expect it to be professional if you want to take a picture of an insect it is going to be blurry. With that price range, the camera you purchase
Canon: picture tends to be yellow when your flash is not bright enough
Sony: picture tends to be blue when your flash is not bright enough

I tends to like the blue better simply I am not a professional photographer with the price 2390 a camera with HD function to take a movie clip zoom 20X plus I think a Sony HD20 suits me the best
作者: blicechan    時間: 2009-7-14 12:07 AM

家下sony都沒什麽好東西啦!一生人縂要衰一次比sony,通常第一次買音響,相機,手提電腦等都會買sony, 結果就真係like.no.other, 只此一次。樓主先去www.dpreview.com 看看相片demo在決定買什麽品牌吧!
作者: vinccichi    時間: 2009-7-15 01:45 AM

個人覺得CANON FUNCTION 上比較好同埋實用..
SONY外觀就比較新潮....FUNCTION WISE既... 只係想用傻瓜機既功能既..
2者比皆可..但都係支持CANON多D..
因為自己係CANON用家 =)
作者: andylook    時間: 2009-7-15 03:10 PM

其實冇咩所謂啦..
DC嘅成像都差唔多....買個樣重要D咯...我覺得....除非你諗住買G10。。。哈哈
作者: 75116936    時間: 2009-7-19 08:22 AM

sony 好 用
作者: jai911    時間: 2009-7-25 02:52 PM

canon.  I am a nikon user but if i have choice for canon or sony, i ill choose canon, i understand sony uses cz lens, but don't be fool with brands.  All mass production lens are polished with machine in the same way but canon has more lens choice, sony on few
作者: moxfactor    時間: 2009-8-4 02:22 PM

you're talking about a $3000 or below DC...  can you seriously tell the different in lens quality of a piece of less than 2.5cm glass?

don't believe in the brand hype when it's just a DC....  just buy what you need depending on the functions.  everything else is bullshit talking.
作者: tvb89    時間: 2009-8-4 05:21 PM

Ofcourse Canon, overall, but Sony is catching up, build quality may be Sony.
作者: tvb89    時間: 2009-8-4 05:23 PM

Ofcourse overall is Canon, but Sony is catching up, built quality may be Sony.
作者: siubundown    時間: 2009-8-28 09:41 PM

canon, better performance.  sony quality is not good.
作者: chauchin    時間: 2009-8-30 03:48 PM

canon is better i think
作者: KAi濤    時間: 2009-9-14 01:06 AM

我認為sony會好d
作者: joeson0827    時間: 2009-9-14 02:23 AM

我會選canon ,因為我都係用緊佢d 相機.........
不過如果講機仔,我個人又覺得,,nikon ,canon ,sony 都真係差唔多,,,,
作者: pq仔    時間: 2009-9-29 07:25 PM

佳能出街不會平地一聲雷 , sony每次出機一定帶來新的衝擊 ,
作者: idatewho    時間: 2009-9-29 07:37 PM

CANON技術比較成熟
作者: ivan04    時間: 2009-10-2 03:09 AM

鏡頭應該係SONY令D,不過CANON 機身感唔錯!機都幾令
作者: rom1314    時間: 2009-10-2 11:14 AM

canon好好多!sony dc噶相偏红调...色彩唔自然...其他牌子都好过sony!
作者: timip03    時間: 2009-10-2 12:13 PM

sony功能好D
作者: doylexx    時間: 2009-10-25 01:06 AM

SONY外形好 CONAN成像好点  其实DC建议还是用松下最好
作者: ericpee82    時間: 2009-11-28 11:28 AM

sony touch screen 好用.它能touch and focus easy.
作者: vinceykc    時間: 2009-11-29 11:56 PM

canon G11
作者: kty716    時間: 2009-12-3 11:41 PM

support canon
作者: night0404    時間: 2009-12-5 02:56 PM

我覺得sony 機影相好易震左...
作者: yingor    時間: 2009-12-20 07:56 PM

我覺得近期黎講就sony 好d
作者: eszia    時間: 2010-1-3 04:10 PM

真是仁者见仁、智者见智。每个品牌都是各有千秋,适合自己要求就是好。
作者: bobng    時間: 2010-1-11 12:13 AM

I have been playing with cameras & darkroom stuff for 40 years.  In the film era, Nikon was the best but for digital, Canon is! Canon's CCD is the best among all.
If you buy Sony, you will regret for life and all accessories are so expensive that ou cannot afford. Ask around!
作者: 12181114    時間: 2010-1-25 09:20 PM

canon G10 is the bestest then all in hand take DC
作者: mabouchen    時間: 2010-2-7 11:50 AM

canon照美女皮膚膚質會很好喔~真的...
作者: kiklee    時間: 2010-4-5 06:04 PM

個人比較喜歡CANON
作者: TAIPOXP    時間: 2010-4-7 06:33 PM

canon is better.
作者: yosh2010    時間: 2010-4-7 07:55 PM

For photo quality; i suggest Canon ; if you are a lady; may be Sony can fit in your pocket
作者: jermery    時間: 2010-4-10 03:58 PM

function --> sony
photo --> canon ...

睇下你想要邊樣啦 ...
作者: junny_blog    時間: 2010-4-12 08:09 AM

(1)民用级
应用在图像质量要求不高的场合, 结构简单,操作简便
代表机型:掌中宝摄像机
SONY:DCR-TRV16E/18E, DCR-PC105/115/
松下: NV-GS30/50、 NV-DS60/65、/88/99
JVC: GR-D30/70AC、GR-V900AC/4000AC
作者: 天天抽茶花    時間: 2010-4-21 12:50 AM

应该佳能好d
作者: ayanan    時間: 2011-2-14 12:30 AM

千萬不要考慮 Son.., 你會後悔
作者: second5cm    時間: 2011-2-14 01:37 AM

No question Canon is better!
作者: tl5877    時間: 2011-3-29 01:52 AM

i wanna know which 1 nice~
作者: Charleshokc    時間: 2011-4-1 04:06 PM

canon is good.
作者: kinmeng    時間: 2011-4-2 01:52 AM

CANON 會好很多
作者: heco1    時間: 2011-4-3 06:35 PM

Canon 比較好...sony 產品好多時都係名過於實...售後服務就更加...唉...




歡迎光臨 公仔箱論壇 (http://os.tvboxnow.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0