4 C4 J& C0 q# D1 ~" r1 Xos.tvboxnow.com別說佛蘭克爾，季辛吉生於一九二三年，現在也八十八歲了。他雖然因此得到諾貝爾和平獎，台灣所有認同中華民國的人，對他難免心懷不滿。但佛蘭克爾倒說了幾句公道話。他指出：季辛吉的長處，在於能整理出一套自成體系的「戰略觀念（strategic concepts）」，抓住問題重點，而把兩造歷史悠久的衝突、仇恨與恐懼暫時放在一邊。 ; e% R! c) w2 P2 _( D) B 1 S/ G4 V: F1 \- G" Q9 g6 n公仔箱論壇佛蘭克爾指出：一九七二年時，大陸人對美國有很大的反感，不只因為美國曾以武力干涉國共鬥爭，而且非常討厭美國整天擺出一副優越的模樣，批評中國不准許民主自由、不尊重個人權利與不容許宗教信仰等等。但季辛吉偏能在兩國外交政策的眾多矛盾中，找出雙方和則兩蒙其利，分則兩敗俱傷的路｜就是前蘇聯對美、中兩國的威脅。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb/ Z, U. l9 v' o! [7 B
8 S* p1 H( r% d3 S " r6 F. A+ K! S% B9 A1 k& Q公仔箱論壇季辛吉的戰略觀念，用書中他自己的話，就是「中、美兩國不管什麼人執政，遲早必然會結合在一起，只是時間問題。（That China and the United States would find a way to come together was inevitable given the necessities of the time.）」。但這句話會是顛撲不破的真理嗎？佛蘭克爾評論老季新書的重點，正在於此。 ( g4 V! v$ u; g/ C, `6 X ; H4 W6 p, x# C j/ I9 Dos.tvboxnow.com國際關係偶爾有平行發展的時候。尼克森在國內反對越戰運動中，受創甚重。大陸則有天安門事件，證明老毛所謂的永恆革命論，根本站不住腳。世界歷史天天循著自然發展的軌道演變，季辛吉所說的「時間問題」，早已面目全非。現在是什麼時間呢？5 ~0 s$ v1 \/ q) _3 q/ U) W
) q) q' g* l a) [( c3 z8 O公仔箱論壇 " B/ t! k+ f9 D7 h* K6 P( k: zKissinger has a dark side that in a way undermines his credibility as a politician. For those who are interested, there is a good documentary called "Trials of Henry Kissinger" on this facet of his character. ; E& K3 u5 c) ^% r, x2 n% {0 btvb now,tvbnow,bttvb: w6 C& Y( G. B* |" L7 V$ G& j
[gv]-2815881561030958784[/gv]% K' a Q" ^) V8 a% L0 Y: \
3 c2 L$ O B; q- w A公仔箱論壇- g) \+ I6 w S2 B3 o/ \ 作者: aa00 時間: 2011-7-4 04:25 PM
As in the video, someone said “He’s a world criminal.” 5 \8 K' u$ L$ U+ i. o/ _: j7 _公仔箱論壇The New York Times (Washington; Dec. 1, 1998) stated that … doubts about international tribunals aimed at former foreign rulers, and worries over the implications for American leaders who might some-day also accused in foreign countries. $ @( u$ L8 |3 d& ~5 ITVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。Geoffrey Robertson QC, Human Rights Lawyer, said … they may be punished sometime in the future???os.tvboxnow.com* S8 j4 {1 ~0 ]+ Y. n
- d2 d1 j: \1 F) Z: i公仔箱論壇Would you believe that? Will it be? Can it be?? - c( f ~8 I5 jI doubt !作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-7-5 01:40 AM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-7-5 01:44 AM 編輯 5 x6 l- y, R1 @9 B7 n. f$ `os.tvboxnow.com7 ~1 N5 b3 n' |9 L8 h; ^: [
I believe his day of reckoning probably would not be in his life time. There are still many documents to be declassified before there is solid evidence to proceed with the indictment, if any. American public are quite naive and gullible, eager to believe whatever said by their politicians. Like Reagan whose hands were dripping with innocent blood, still is one of the most popular presidents. Dissident voices are few in the American media and have low chance of being heard. I still vividly remember the popular support enjoyed by George W Bush when he prepared the invasion of Iraq. Although there were a few who questioned the justification for the war, it remained a hardly noticeable minority.作者: aa00 時間: 2011-7-6 12:10 PM
At this point, I can't see any difference between USA & China ……… high hand (sorry to use Chinglish as more familiar ) to hide.作者: felicity2010 時間: 2011-7-6 01:51 PM
本帖最後由 felicity2010 於 2011-7-7 01:34 PM 編輯 Q5 s# M( P8 |. Jtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb$ {$ W, r+ W$ K
Although it looks the same, there are actually differences. There are system in place to declassify documents after a time, usually 25 years in US. The parties having interests in the documents can extend the time before declassification. However, individuals or organizations can apply for the declassification through Mandatory Declassification Review or for Freedom of Information Act. A decision would be made by higher authority. Of course, there are ways to get around this like partially revealing the documents and yet keeping the names and dates or other sensitive data hidden but it is still within the confines of the law. The Chinese government can put a lid on scandals using heavy-handed means like imprisonment based on trumped-up charges or direct threats, oblivion of the rule of law.
