yea. i was disappointed at that part too - ]7 N! c* u4 c. V% c% J, jtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbhow can it be an accident? ; h0 L! e( Y) Q+ ~7 ?that piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill? 0 R& V, P+ t! k& u5 l% heven Kevin's experiment failed作者: cheerful12 時間: 2011-6-16 12:10 PM
yea. i was disappointed at that part too5 \% t# b* ]: I2 b- J6 A9 \- B
how can it be an accident? ; q! h: I1 s/ E2 ]) }( Tthat piece of glass was accerlated so strongly that it can kill? 7 I1 C/ V5 G% I* m5 R3 h* {公仔箱論壇even Kevin's experiment failed作者: justinsong 時間: 2011-6-16 04:06 PM
呢度剧本唔通作者: edwinhiht 時間: 2011-6-18 01:02 AM
聽古唔好駁古..但我都頂唔住, 咁都作得出,跌落街都易合理d啦作者: buzz21 時間: 2011-6-18 01:04 AM
唉....故仔真係故仔... 咩都由佢講作者: bbtang47 時間: 2011-6-18 01:43 AM
everyone here is very pro..作者: ava7 時間: 2011-6-24 08:36 PM
yes..i dont agree that作者: lightpink 時間: 2011-6-24 09:04 PM
係咯，係咯作者: mrfusion 時間: 2011-6-24 10:11 PM
for the glass fragment to strike her, the glass has to be smash at a precise speed and precise angle with a precise orientation, and possibly if the glass has any pre-existing defect. / |$ ?5 n. o: D% W 2 Q& X2 l& v6 x3 F9 o公仔箱論壇the possibiolity is endless which will make it impossible to repeat the experiment.
!!