Board logo

標題: [討論] 第一场过后,曼联的问题 [打印本頁]

作者: rivaldoliu    時間: 2007-8-13 01:53 AM     標題: 第一场过后,曼联的问题

第一场比赛打完了,曼联0:0被雷丁逼平,痛失两分
呢场比赛暴露咗唔少问题。

1.曼联需要一个中锋。今场波雷丁摆出铁桶阵,死守曼联,曼联全场基本上就係压住半场嚟打。但係全场2X次射门居然无功而返,呢个同曼联缺少一个中锋非常有关系。曼联的射门主要分成两类:一、就係禁区顶附近的远射;二、就係传中后射门。但係呢两类射门对于铁桶阵嚟讲等于瘙痒。呢场波,雷丁禁区顶附近长期部署咗4、5个,响没中锋的情况,你根本没可能舒服起脚。至于传中就更加唔洗讲了。个波高速跌落嚟,用脚射门要比头槌难太多了。
如果曼联有一个中锋,今场波局面可能完全唔同了。首先中锋队员可以响禁区顶吸引对方1-2个人的防守,而且佢有时仲可以顶住对方球员,令到佢地唔可以轻易冲出嚟拦截禁区顶后杀伤的攻击。其次,中锋可以作为一个明显的传中点。今场波朗尼落场后,曼联就完全没前锋了。没中锋的好处就係球的运转更快,对方难以防备插上突破,但係今场波呢个好处就明显见唔到。但係没前锋的坏处今场波表露无为。响朗尼落去之前,尽管朗尼浪费咗唔少机会,但係起码佢都係一个相对固定的点。但係当朗尼落去后,曼联就完全没点了。呢度同独孤九剑的剑意有相似之处——无招自然无法防御,招招比敌人快、招招攻向敌人弱点,敌人自然就要只能守不能攻。但係曼联的“无招"根本就没法指向对方的弱点。曼联今场波几个翼锋经常都可以杀到落底线,但係佢地佢只能将波更多地传返到禁区顶给后杀上的队友射波。大家知道,嚟球门越远,入波难度越大。禁区顶射波肯定就没你传中给中锋顶头槌的成功率来得高。如果有个中锋,曼联可能赢咗了。可惜,足球没有如果。

2.艾华唔适合打中场/翼锋。或许係车路士果场波给咗费sir信心,令到费sir今场将艾华放响翼锋的位置。但係我地要明白,对车路士果场,艾华的助攻係C朗撑个波给佢,然后佢插落底线传中,杰斯跟上射远角。佢插落底线传中呢个明显就係一个边后卫的技术。而翼锋更多係要带球突破,呢点显然艾华係做唔到,佢或者可以靠速度硬吃对手,但係要佢用技术过人就没可能了。而且当对手速度和艾华差唔多的时候,艾华身体的劣势就表露无为了,此时如果仲要佢带球突破,根本就係强人所难。所以佢仲係比较适合打边位后插上。

3.史高斯、斯维斯达状态问题。今场波,史高斯刚刚伤愈,状态可以讲係一般,上半场明显有几次失误。下半场果个近门头槌力量、角度欠奉。费sir今场用佢,或者係因为夏格维斯、anderson个态唔得。但係史高斯刚刚伤愈,个态唔给佢地好好多,而且佢地周中都有呕打友谊赛,点解唔将其中1-2个摆响后备席呢?费sir响新人问题上都係略嫌保守咗D。斯维斯达明显唔可以给人有足够的信心。费sir宜家真係要林林左边,轩斯到底係走顶留?如果走,买个咩野人补充呢?

今场波已经过去,希望费sir可以睇到今场波曼联的问题,对症下药,准备好周中扑茅的挑战。宜家到9月1号仲有1X日,希望曼联可以有更多动作进一步完善球队的阵型。

另外前几日睇到一篇文章将tevez+朗尼比作当你的黑风双煞,个人唔係太认同。首先,当年曼联打双中锋要给打单中锋强。当年左突右砍,加上艾云、加里的后插上,传中球非常多,呢个时候用双中锋等于传中有两个落点,入波机会会打打增加。而且双中锋对于对手后防的压力更大,可以给到后插上的球员更多空间,当年史高斯、坚尼得到唔少后插上的射门机会,而且仲有不错的成功率。
而宜家的朗尼、tevez组合,係双前锋,而且都係控球策应型前锋。佢地两个都係要回撤拿波,然后带球杀入。如果加埋C朗、nani(giggs),曼联可以带球突破的球员多达4个,而且4个都係需要距离冲起来的,呢个时候边个顶响中间呢?如果tevez顶响中间,我唔会怀疑佢的突破能力,但係抢点唔同带波突破,身材係抢点的一个非常重要的因素。而且tevez顶响最前面,基本上曼联出高波就等于同对方解围了。167要顶硬18X实在是太难了吧?而如果朗尼顶响前面呢?朗尼的身材唔洗怀疑,但係佢的把握机会能力我非常怀疑。上赛季朗尼响曼联先后同saha和拿臣搭档,呢两个球员都係有D中锋打法,后者就特别明显了,而朗尼就係负责回后拿波后杀伤。当你朗尼打中锋时,对住D有级数的球队就好成问题了,客场惨败给AC仲係历历在目啊,当然呢场波同曼联集体低迷都有关系。至于tevez响韦斯咸一样唔係顶佢最前面,佢前面仲有希活等中锋型球员帮佢顶住,等到下半场打突击时可能就会净返佢一个响前面,果时佢净係可以讲係一个游击手而唔係一个中锋。当年黑风双煞周位非常纯熟,根本唔会出现重叠之类的问题,而且佢地都唔会用波,只係专心走位、等机会。而宜家tevez、朗尼到底要点揉合呢?两个都係要用波、冲起身先有威力,佢两个的组合前景係一个疑问。
作者: janleung    時間: 2007-8-13 02:38 AM

轉會市場仲未關,仲可以買人
作者: ljw1982    時間: 2007-8-13 08:08 AM

ya the transfer market still open... hope ferguson can buy some world class player to solve the problem....
作者: crashersus    時間: 2007-8-13 09:24 AM

rivaldoliu 兄分析得不错,but i think with current MU squad, it is good enough. Mayb this is just the 1st match of the league lar...most of the player still not click with each other. And this problem not only happen in MU. take a look to the other team which have new player joining team. Arsenal, Chealsea, Liverpool. yup...althought the other 3major team also win the game. but they win it with a lot of struggle. still cannot say they are all play in 行云流水...but compare them with MU...despite am the MU fans...i think every1 can see that MU forward line up is better then other. try to compare the stats. MU have the most 25shoot, 13 of them on target. Whereby chealsea only have 13shoot 5 on target. Yup, it is very sad for MU not to win this. but we just can't ignore the superb performance by Reading goalkeeper, which is the man of the match. he is force to make a save at least 12ball from the shoot of target. so, if he is not there...i think MU will win by dozen lar....And ho, with the attacking line up and create so many shoot which just like last season, i think MU future is good...And u know wat...Teves is going to have his debut when MU play Porstmouth at away lar.....good new though...
作者: kyc888    時間: 2007-8-13 07:13 PM

o my god ,Liverpool ,Chelsea and Arsenal also win :024:  
作者: footballitis    時間: 2007-8-13 07:14 PM

Evra is crap, can't play as a left back nevermind about left winger
what i don't really understand is why on earth they didn't put any striker on the bench??
Anderson or Teves??
i don't think they should buy anymore players as they got a strong squad, but ferguson need to use them wisely, stick to the good old 442 and put giggs on the wing instead of evra
Tactial Error




歡迎光臨 公仔箱論壇 (http://os.tvboxnow.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0